Figure 1:Health expenditure per capita (provided by OECD)
The US spends two and a half times the amount of money in
healthcare expenditures than the average OECD country. Two and a half
times?! For that amount of money one
would think that the US had the best health outcomes as well as the lowest
mortality rates across the board when looking at the five key indicators of health.
Again, you would be disappointed.
Table 1: Key indicators of health (provided by the WHO)
Life
expectancy at birth
|
Infant
mortality rate
|
Neonatal
mortality rate
|
Maternal
mortality rate
|
Under
5 mortality rate
|
|
USA
(2009)
|
78 years
|
6.5
|
4
|
21
|
7.6
|
France
(2009)
|
81.8
|
3.5
|
2
|
8
|
4.3
|
So what is the reason behind the lag in American healthcare?
Why are we constantly ranked so low in comparison to many of our global peers?
As shown in Figure 1, the US the healthcare system is
extremely fragmented, with roughly 50% of our healthcare determined by private
vectors (OECD, 2012). In contrast, France, one of the top ranked countries in
terms of global health by the World Bank, spends comparatively little in the private
sector, focusing the majority of its efforts through public offerings. Not to
say that the public sector is the way to go. But leading economists believe it
plays a part:
“ My explanation for the relative high prices Americans pay for health care relative to other countries is that the payment side of the health care market in the private sector is fragmented, weakening the bargaining power of individual insurers, especially vis-à-vis the increasingly consolidated hospital sector….”
An incredibly enlightening little tool to play around with
can be found at this website. Healthcare bluebook allows people to search for
basic health care services in their area and determine the price of each
procedure. We invite you to play with this and see how the results change based
on location. Or click here to see how consumerreports.org finds the US spread
of pricing wanting.
The United States is constantly left in the dust, struggling
to maintain its superior status among the leading nations in healthcare
systems. Until some drastic changes are made to the management of these
systems, however, it is very unlikely to change in our favor. From the data, it is easy to conclude why
United States Citizens pay far more than their counter parts for health care.
However, the question remains as to how we got here in the first place and why
is there not an outpouring of cry to change. The answer is very simple; it goes
back to the fundamental beliefs of the majority of the stakeholders in this
nation that access to healthcare services is not considered a right, but a
luxury that must be obtained by picking yourself up by the bootstraps, working
hard and not asking for help. The following quote from the NY Times helps to sum
up this idea.
“Our reliance on private enterprise to provide the most essential of services stems, in part, from a more narrow understanding of our collective responsibility to provide social goods. Private American healthcare has stood out for decades among industrial nations, where public universal coverage has long been considered a right of citizenship.”
In order to implement change, to lower the cost of
healthcare, we must first change the mindset of the stakeholders holding the
majority of the vote. We must think of
healthcare as a right of citizenship.
Only when that has been achieved, can healthcare services transition
from a for profit business to an essential social service.
No comments:
Post a Comment